Demonstration · Synthetic fixture data · No real reports, notifications, or payments
sentinelEvidence

Project Sentinel

Your work,on the record.

Register it. Seal the evidence. Put every possible copy in front of a person. The decision stays with the rights holder.

A sealed evidence emblem inside a glass sphere, with evidence frames travelling along luminous orbits Evidence seal SHA-256 Human review 13 checks Owner decision Yours
Register + Review + ResolveExplore Sentinel

Evidence, not accusation

Most tools stop at a match. Sentinel carries a match all the way to a decision.

Sentinel is a creator-rights platform for evidence and decisions. It registers original work, seals a private record, compares possible copies signal by signal, and routes every case through human review to the rights holder, who decides what happens next.

How Sentinel works

How a case moves

Every step.On the record.

Seven stages, and three of them are held by people that no score can skip. Most leads are expected to stop early. That is the design.

Walk through each stage
  1. Upload the original and group it into catalogs. Declare the accounts and licences already allowed to use it, so reuse you allow never becomes a lead.

    CreatorRegistered work · version 1

  2. File hash, timestamps and provenance are sealed. The database refuses any edit or deletion; a new file becomes a new version with its own seal.

    SentinelEvidence seal · SHA-256

  3. Discovery runs under a fail-closed source policy, and signed-in scouts submit public URLs. Duplicate, conflict and fraud checks run before anyone reviews.

    Discovery or scoutLead · public URL only

  4. Picture, motion and sound are scored separately. A video match needs three consecutive aligned frames, never one similar still.

    Matching engineAI-detected match

  5. A reviewer works a 13-point checklist and advances, rejects, or asks for more evidence. Reward amounts are hidden from them.

    Named reviewerHuman-validated lead

  6. A neutral private notice, then the owner's call: authorized, licensed, unknown or unauthorized. Saying a use was authorized is an accurate outcome.

    Verified ownerOwner decision

  7. If a funded campaign covers the case, the first valid scout may be rewarded, but only after a separate person approves the payout.

    Bounty administratorAward · approved separately

Glass tiles rising along a lit path, with gates over some of the steps
Creator registryStudio Demo Clip
Legal statusSentinel evidence registered
OwnershipClaimed owner, pending verification
MonitoringOn
Authorized accounts & licencesDeclared by creator
Evidence certificatePrivate record
Seal · 2026-10-27 07:02 UTCf5a5cb6a22162c60390047…88747d1ea2decb
Printed on every certificate
This record documents file identity, timestamps, provenance, and ownership claims. It is not a U.S. Copyright Office registration or a legal determination of ownership.
Scout reportPublic URL only
https://… public page of the suspected copy
Duplicate checkFirst valid reporter
Conflict-of-interest checkPer case
Fraud scoreAdvisory, never a denial
Private & loopback addressesRefused
Technical signalsCase 5ade357c
  • Picture0.973
  • Motion0.984
  • Sound1.000
  • Textnot evaluated
TransformationMirrored
Review checklistAll 13 required
  • Work is distinctive
  • Plausible source relationship
  • Original is not itself a repost
  • Recipient plausibly connected to the work
  • Legitimate public contact method
  • No known licence or authorization
  • + 7 more checks
Owner portalWas this use authorized?
Not my workReport a false positive
Optional resolutionAttribution · licence · removal
Payout pathSimulated in demo
Qualifying human record on filerequired
Campaign pool balance checkedrequired
Approval by a separate administratorperson
Payout, onceidempotent
01 / Register workOne case. Seven records. Three people who must say yes.Select a stage to explore

Found a copy of someone's work?

Scouts report a public URL. Only the first valid report can qualify for a bounty.

How scout reports work

The product, as built

Built to hold up.Built to be checked.

A live evidence record from the working prototype: the original beside the suspected copy, each signal scored on its own, and only the records that actually exist.

Open the full record
Evidence record · case 5ade357cLive demo data
Evidence record · Case 5ade357c Prototype record · demo data
Original
Registered work Studio Demo Clip Seal f5a5cb6a22…a2decb
Suspected copy
Suspected copy Mirrored Similarity 0.839

Technical signalsTemporal consistency met

  • Picture0.973
  • Motion0.984
  • Sound1.000
  • Textnot evaluated

Record ladderSeparate records, separate people

  1. SignalAI-detected match
  2. ReviewerHuman-validated lead
  3. Rights holderOwner-confirmed unauthorized use
Four stacked glass plates, one for each kind of evidence record

Four records, never blurred

What a match is.What it is not.

Four kinds of evidence, kept in separate records made by different parties. Public language follows the record that actually exists, and nothing higher.

  1. AI-detected match

    A similarity signal and a candidate transformation. It opens a review. It is not a conclusion.

    Made by the matching pipelineUnlocks human review only
  2. Human-validated lead

    A named reviewer completed all 13 checks and advanced the case.

    Made by a reviewerDoes not mean the use was unauthorized
  3. Owner-confirmed unauthorized use

    The verified owner said this specific use was not authorized. It is the standard bounty trigger.

    Made by the verified ownerDoes not mean a court finding
  4. Legally determined infringement

    Exists only when a court or other authoritative process has ruled on that case. Rare, and never assumed. On file in this instance: 0.

    Made by a court or authoritySentinel records it, never creates it

Signals, not verdicts

Explainable.Tuned for precision.

The matcher is the evidence engine inside the workflow, not the product. It shows its work and prefers a missed copy over a false accusation.

Temporal alignment between an original and a suspected copy Five consecutive frames of the original align with five frames of the copy; at least three consecutive aligned frames are required before a video match counts. Sound landmarks align on a separate lane. 5 aligned in a row · 3 required ORIGINAL COPY SOUND Spectral landmarks matched with speed and pitch tolerance
Aligned frames (picture + motion)Matched sound landmarksDiagram of the match rule, not a measured case
  • Picture, motion and sound are scored separately and shown side by side, so a reviewer can see which signal carried a match.
  • One similar frame is never a video match. At least three consecutive source frames must keep aligning, and a region-aware stage handles crops, borders, picture-in-picture and split screens.
  • Text is marked "not evaluated". This build has no text or plagiarism matching, and the evidence view says so instead of implying a score.
  • Untrusted media is decoded in a locked-down sandbox with size, pixel-count and time limits.
Benchmark · 36 generated video fixturesSynthetic corpus
1.000
Precision
23/23 flagged matches correct
0.885
Recall
23/26 known copies found
0/10
False matches
look-alike negatives flagged
3
Known misses
published, not hidden
Re-encode, speed, pitch, audio, clip, reorder10/10
Mirror and caption overlay3/3
Crop, border, letterbox, pillarbox6/7
Picture-in-picture and split screen4/5
Segment inside a longer compilation0/1
Look-alike negatives correctly rejected10/10
Generated test clips, not real-world content. These figures describe the current matcher on this corpus only and are not an accuracy guarantee. Missed: small picture-in-picture flush against the frame edge; short segment embedded in a longer compilation; heavy crop (about 35% removed).

Scout bounties

Paid for outcomes.Never for a score.

A creator can fund a campaign for one work or a catalog, or a case can draw on the public-interest pool. A platform fee is disclosed before anyone funds. Most reports are expected to end without a payment.

01 · Lead reward

Verified technical lead

A reviewer validated the scout's lead. Smaller, and only when the campaign offers it.

RequiresA reviewer's advance decision on that case

02 · Standard reward

Owner-confirmed unauthorized use

The verified owner confirmed that this specific use was not authorized.

RequiresThe owner's own confirmation

03 · Optional bonus

Resolution bonus

The owner recorded an outcome such as attribution, a licence, or a removal request.

RequiresA standard award plus an owner-confirmed resolution

Computing an award is arithmetic. Approving it is a person. A bounty administrator who is not the scout approves each payout once, with an idempotency key. Holds, clawbacks and appeals are built in. In this demonstration every payment is simulated.

Plain language

Rights work goes wrong when a tool sounds more certain than it is. These three statements appear in the product wherever they apply.

Seals are private records Every match goes to a person The rights holder decides Courts decide infringement

A clearer path to a decision

See one caseend to end.

Follow a case through both sides of the workflow, from a sealed original to the owner's decision.

Evidence frames orbiting a glowing seal inside a glass sphere